🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.